Saturday, February 4, 2012Partly Cloudy -6°C
City

Don't be a jerk: A guide to rolling on Montreal's streets

Posted by Margot / August 13, 2010

Bike path lachine cycling Quebec Montreal BixiYesterday on my way to work, I almost took out another cyclist who had snuck up from behind and tried to pass me on my right on a bike path. Dude was wearing his earbuds and didn't hear my (semi-) polite suggestion that he not do that. But it was on my way up St-Laurent around going-home time (when the lady in front of me got doored) that I figured it was high time Midnight Poutine disseminated a much-needed guide to cycling etiquette on this crazy city's streets.

Cars, bikes, and people on foot seem to have a contentious relationship in this city. Having been each a driver, cyclist, and pedestrian at one point in time, I think I border that liminal space between all three (much like the Rain Man); I know how annoying one can be when you're in the others' shoes. And in this position of omniscience, I've come up with the simplest of all rules: Don't be a jerk. It's great; it applies to all situations, and can be broken down into these eight subsections.

1. Sidewalks: Inherent in the word, they were made for walking. Exceptions include adapted transport and children under the age of 10. Otherwise, get your stinky two-wheeled self on the street. And if you're not comfortable on the street (because you might get doored or hit by a car), get yourself to a side street. It's only one block away. Which brings us to...

Bixi Montreal bicycle2. Direction: We're not in the old country, chap, or down under, mate. Here in Canada, we generally drive on the right, and bicycles are no exception. Same goes for riding on a one-way street; at any given point, you're probably about a block away from a street that goes in the same direction you're going. Don't want to get flattened by that chump doing 80 in a quiet neighbourhood? Start by going in the right direction. Alternately, go over four more streets and find yourself on a...

3. Bike path: Oh, the tomes I could write about bike lane etiquette. But sticking with simplicity (i.e. don't be a jerk), we'll go with this: if you absolutely need to pass someone, do it on their left, and make sure you're not impeding oncoming bike traffic. And if you're doing it to get ahead, make sure you're actually getting ahead - there's nothing more annoying that playing race-car between stoplights. You're not Lance Armstrong, buddy. (And if you're like me, you avoid bike paths altogether because there are for too many jerks using them. Like people who decide to stop in...)

Maisonneuve Montreal Bixi
4. Crosswalks: If you're going to stop at a stoplight or stop sign (which you should, or at least pretend to), don't stop in the crosswalk. Much like the sidewalk, a crosswalk was designed for walking; when it comes to crosswalks, pedestrians normally have the right of way. So if you're flying through a stop sign to save on brake pads or whatever and nearly hit a pedestrian, you're being a jerk. Don't be.

5. Bixis: I have a love/hate relationship with these rental monsters. They're bringing bikes to a bunch of people who might not have previously found cycling accessible. They've also inspired one of the best YouTube videos of the year. Still, some people with Bixis can be a bit reckless, so give them a wide berth. Also, they're a bit slower (not necessarily due to lack of skill on the riders' part; those things weigh a ton, to which I can testify after having dropped one on my foot), so try not to get stuck behind a fleet o' Bixis.

6. Music: I'll be the first to admit that music is generally amazing, and having it piped into your head 24/7 might be one of the blessings of our age. But there's a reason they're calling us Generation Deaf, and maybe time spent on your bike should be time spent away from your iDevice. Then, you might be able to hear that person who is politely cursing because they almost took you out, or that truck that is about to run you over.

7. Lanes: Sorry drivers, but cyclists are entitled to take up an entire lane if it means not getting killed on the way home. You're in a car, though, so chill out; you'll still going to get home before the person on their bike.

8. Helmets: They mess up your hair, might look slightly dorky, set you back 30 bucks at Canadian Tire, and can be a pain to carry around, but traumatic brain injury is so passé. Helmets are worth wearing. Always.

Montreal cycling pedestrian BixiOf course this list isn't exhaustive; it's lacking indeed. And full disclosure: I break approximately 83% of these rules in the first 32 minutes of each day. I'm a firm believer that rules (including these ones suggested) are made to be broken, but I think that people should at least be vigilant and courteous in their rule-breaking.

P.S. to the woman who doored the cyclist yesterday: As evidenced by what you said ("Don't worry about my car, as long as you're alright"), you're inadvertently the first follower of my rule. Decent people: 1, jerks: zero.

Thanks to pasdecouleur, majamonster, BILLBINNS, and Loveless future for the pretty pictures

Discussion

19 Comments

AT / August 13, 2010 at 09:39 pm
user-pic
I would add:
9. Traffic lights (!)
Jeremy L / August 13, 2010 at 10:10 pm
user-pic
I would add:

Who are you to think you can jump the whole line when people line up at a street light? You can wait with everyone else.
Shawn C / August 13, 2010 at 11:04 pm
user-pic
And for the people in cars, if you've missed your turn please go around the block and try again. Do not back up into the intersection or the bicycle lane.
Chase / August 14, 2010 at 09:12 am
user-pic
Thank you Rain Man!
Alice Bolen / August 14, 2010 at 01:11 pm
user-pic
Thank you so much for this list. I hope it is actually read and taken seriously!

It is a perilous world out there for cyclists. I wish drivers licensing involved more stringent cyclist awareness training.

Additionally, we can't act like jerks on our bikes either.
Gabby / August 14, 2010 at 03:47 pm
user-pic
I think every single cyclist should be forced to read a printout of this post and sign at the bottom with their blood.
Bill Lee / August 15, 2010 at 10:07 pm
user-pic
[helmets] and gloves.
You don't want to hear of finger amputation stories from Emergency doctors who have to deal with the infection from
having palms and fingers slammed into the tarmac when coming
off a bike, setting one up for micro-infections from the tiny
bits of gravel that broke through the skin and have to be
painstakingly taken out every time the doctor finds more dead or dying flesh that has to be debrided or the tendon and finger has to be cut off.
Gloves, with leather palms, your second safety skin.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debridement
Margot / August 15, 2010 at 10:49 pm
user-pic
Yes to traffic lights, line-up etiquette, and leather gloves (gross medical picture, btw; thanks for that!).

And one thing that I'll add to my list after a weekend of hyper-vigilance to transportation infractions: cellphones. Always a bad idea in transit, on two and four wheels alike.
Gerard / August 15, 2010 at 10:52 pm
user-pic
Word.
rob / August 16, 2010 at 04:35 pm
user-pic
sorry guys. this is lame. every man for himself
td / August 17, 2010 at 08:40 am
user-pic
Bike drivers talking on their cell phone with one hand and drinking a slushie with the other one, while driving, is pretty impressive.
Mathieu R / August 17, 2010 at 05:01 pm
user-pic
De plus en plus de cyclistes semblent croire que tout le monde sur la route s'attend à ce qu'ils brûlent les feux rouges. J'ai plus d'une fois frôlé une collision avec des cyclistes qui ne ralentissent même pas à un stop. Passez sur la rouge si vous le voulez, mais ayez la courtoisie de ralentir et de regarder autour de vous pendant une seconde.

J'approuve de la liste en général, sauf pour une chose: je n'enlèverai pas mes earbuds. Désolé.
Jon / August 18, 2010 at 01:42 pm
user-pic
Running Reds:

Despite the fact it's illegal some <bad> bikers whine about bike rights on the road but then don't follow road rules...

Etiquette/Pet Peeve (obviously)
When a slower biker runs a red, especially on a packed street like St-Denis, faster law abiding bikers are forced to pass/re-pass the slower biker when they've caught up. Passing can be pretty dangerous in these situations (packed street); taking the 20 seconds to stop avoids possible 'passing related' collisions.

Not passing is another solution, but this is in specific reference to running reds.
MlleMlle replying to a comment from Jeremy L / August 18, 2010 at 03:06 pm
user-pic
I dunno bout this one...waiting and cutting the slower riders at a light is often a lot safer than passing them...especially if you don't follow signalization. And it makes for fun when someone get all insulted and passes you by afterward pedaling with all their might. Always guys, never the hot ones.
dewolf / August 20, 2010 at 12:23 am
user-pic
Why shouldn't bikes go the wrong way down a one-way street? I'm not talking about St-Laurent or Ste-Catherine, I'm talking about quiet side-streets like Clark, Jeanne-Mance and so on. They're perfect routes for biking but they change directions many times over their length. There are some counterflow bike lanes to accommodate cyclists, but those are still rare.

If you're going from Villeneuve/Jeanne-Mance up to Bernard/Jeanne-Mance, the best way is to simply ride up Jeanne-Mance or Esplanade. But these streets change directions three times during that stretch. So what are you going to do? Change streets every two blocks just to follow the rules? No, that's absurd. Those streets are one-way to slow down cars and prevent through-traffic. You'd have to double or triple the amount of distance you cover if you were to avoid going the wrong way on your bike.

Until counterflow bike lanes are installed on every single one-way side-street, cyclists have no choice but to break the law by going against traffic.
Pierre / August 22, 2010 at 10:51 am
user-pic
FYI Police can give you an amend for wearing earbuds while biking…
They also started to arrest bikers who burn lights.

Le port du casque relève d'une responsabilité propre. Cela n'impacte pas la conduite des autres… et ne justifie en aucun cas que les conducteurs de voitures/camions n'utilisent pas leurs clignotants ni ne regardent dans leurs angles morts.
Alice replying to a comment from MlleMlle / August 24, 2010 at 05:20 pm
user-pic
Haha. I'm going to have to agree with MLLEMLLE on this one. It is a lot safer to jump the lineup at the stop light if you plan on biking through quickly... and it's always pretty funny when people get offended.
david / August 30, 2010 at 08:23 am
user-pic
I'm not sure I agree with the red light traffic light advice. Streets are wide enough for all intersections to effectively be rotaries for bikes, but, alas, they are designed with cars in mind. This is particularly relevant in cities that allow right-on-red turns.

In many cases I feel treating red lights as stop signs for bikes improves flow and avoids clogging when the red light turns green. The biggest problem with having bikes and cars on the street is dealing with vastly different levels of acceleration and this is most obvious when both cars and bikes are "going" at a green light.

Anyway, don't break the law or anything but I'd love to see the "laws" changed for bikes. There is something to be said for going with effective laws rather than what is written if it does not compromise safety too much.
Gabriel / September 30, 2010 at 06:57 pm
user-pic
I can't believe I'm only reading this now...

Great article.

I think everyone forgot one thing though.


Bikers should learn and signal more.


Knowing what the bike in front of you is planning on doing, weather you are a car or bike riding behind is half the battle battle. GI JOE!

Add a Comment

Other Cities: TorontoVancouver